GuildWiki talk:Writing good builds
From GuildWiki
Contents |
[edit] FC air
I will be removing that section pretty soon, the 3 builds we had
were all cases of people not searching for existing ones — Skuld 13:39,
22 July 2006 (CDT)
- Shouldn't it be kept as a reference? Something like what we had
with Air Spikers is bound to happen again. — Rapta
(talk|contribs) 13:45, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
so I want to submit a build... but I still have no idea where to do that... help?
[edit] Name of this article
This should really be called "How to write a good build" (or something similar), since it is mainly a guide on how to write a build, not evaluate one. --Xeeron 06:39, 4 September 2006 (CDT)
- As far as names go, why is the shortcut to this GW:WBE?
Write/Writing Builds something, maybe Effectively? Clarification?
-
Krowman
01:42, 23 February 2007 (CST)
- This article used to be named "written build evaluation." (Hence Xeeron's comment from many months ago.) --Fyren 01:45, 23 February 2007 (CST)
[edit] Latest edit
[1] is this right? — Skuld 09:01, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
- Hmmm google says yes, but the high number of counts for both seems to suggest that both are in use. Anyway I'll let the native speakers have their day arguing here. --Xeeron 09:46, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
[2] Makes sense? — Rapta
(talk|contribs) 19:04, 25
November 2006 (CST)
[edit] Special Cases
Added:
-
- If your build already exists, there are two options available
to you.
- If the existing version of the build is unfavored, the unfavored build should be modified to your liking, rather than creating a new build page.
- If the existing version of the build is in any other category, the build should simply not be made. Instead, suggest changes in the existing version's talk page as to why your version may be better than the current revision of the article.
- If your build already exists, there are two options available
to you.
Any comments or disputes? — Rapta
(talk|contribs) 13:44, 2
February 2007 (CST)